coffeelooki.blogg.se

1. COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS INSTALL
2. COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS SOFTWARE
3. COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS FREE
4. COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS WINDOWS

COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS WINDOWS

So, YES - they do give more protection than the Windows FW alone. They help the user to easily configure the Windows FW. Front-end apps are very user-friendly.Examples of 3rd party FW are: Comodo and Evorim.Īs to your question, " Do they give more protection than the Windows firewall?". Some Wilders folks prefer to use a 3rd party, self-sufficient FW instead of using the Windows FW. There are several excellent front-end apps that are being discussed here at Wilders. A front-end application lets the user easily configure the Windows FW. Therefore, many Wilders members use a "front end" application. It is a good FW but it is difficult to configure. On a side note, I'm aware someone named "webfork" saying reputations are important is a little odd.As you probably know, Windows has its own built-in FireWall (FW). This is the only way to encourage these groups to stay on track. As such, when security companies make mistakes and expose their users, the revenues for their company as a whole should take a hit.Additionally, assuming you're right and its the marketing guys misbehaving while the devs are innocent, companies like this shouldn't be run in a distributed fashion like that: a top-down emphasis on reliability is the only way to run a security company.

There are a long list of problems with this, such as sellers forced to use the crappy Amazon interface for its reputation as a strong security portal, good web traffic getting dumped or blocked because it doesn't have trusted certs, and even fewer ways to discern good from bad companies. Now discussions are up on Slashdot about abandoning the cert system altogether.

Comodo is a great product, but the certificate issue isn't just a hiccup - its a huge failure to maintain some kind of trust system on the internet.

COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS FREE

COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS SOFTWARE

IMO developers working for a security software company would be the ones who most value privacy and would object to any possibility of backdoors or anything that would make the software less secure. they would be completely different departments within the company, the certificates would be sold by salespeople and managers (and we all know how trustworthy they are ), the software would be written by developers. Hydaral wrote:Selling security certificates to malicious groups, even knowingly, doesn't really have anything to do with their software. The IP can always be blocked by the hosts file. I used to use Kerio, until they changed to Sunbelt and made the software a system hog and simplified it. Am I being naive?Īs for the data-collection thing, that is a concern, but unfortunately there aren't that many good free, highly configurable firewalls, not last time I looked anyway. Selling security certificates to malicious groups, even knowingly, doesn't really have anything to do with their software. Backdoors to the FBI, Big brother, cannibal lawyers, bars of soap comes to mind. Now I wish I took the foresight that ANYTHING could be a potential privacy/security risk, even those that are supposed to protect your data.

COMODO FIREWALL FORUMS INSTALL

ChipsNHotSauce wrote:I started using Comodo Firewall on my new machine, and was planning to install on other machines.